THEBLACKBOOK AUDIT
Investigation · The Corporate State Hub

A Distinction Without Separation

Project 2025 has a plan. It also has a religion. This is the movement engine — the people, the institutions, and the holy-war rhetoric behind the blueprint.

The phrase in the title is not ours. It is how an Opus Dei-affiliated institution describes the proper relationship between church and state on its own website: “a distinction without separation, a union without confusion.” This page grades the record behind Project 2025’s architects — Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts and Federalist Society co-chair Leonard Leo — on their own documented ties, admissions, and words.

§1 · Summary Brief

What this page is about

Project 2025’s policy content is documented in They Published the Plan. This page is about the engine: the religious project behind the blueprint, and the two men most responsible for it. Kevin Roberts, who built Project 2025, has documented ties to Opus Dei-led institutions — including, by his own admission, weekly mass at a center run by an Opus Dei priest. Leonard Leo, who built the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority, describes the fight in the language of spiritual warfare.

Everything below is graded on the primary record — FACT on the ties, admissions, quotes, and the agenda. The larger claim, that traditionalist Catholics and evangelicals have converged into a single governing movement, we present as this page’s argument, graded SOME SMOKE, not as a proven coalition.

What we are NOT saying
We are not saying Kevin Roberts is a member of Opus Dei — membership is not publicly asserted, and we report only his documented ties and his own account of his worship. We are not asserting, in our own voice, that Opus Dei is “radical”; that is the Guardian’s characterization, and we attribute it. We are not claiming Donald Trump personally authored Project 2025 — his campaign publicly disavowed it, and we say so. And we are not claiming a secret, formally organized conspiracy: the Catholic-evangelical alliance is our analytical read of a documented convergence, offered as argument. What we are doing is letting these men’s own words and admissions stand in the open.
Recommended reading

Books that go deeper on this story. Links are Amazon affiliate searches — buying through them supports the work at no cost to you.

▶ Dossier

The same investigation, restaged one beat at a time. Step through it here, or present it fullscreen.

The Corporate State

A Distinction Without Separation.

Project 2025 has a plan. It also has a religion. The movement engine behind the blueprint — Kevin Roberts, Leonard Leo, and their own words on church and state.

1 / 9▶ Present fullscreen
Timeline

The record, in order

5 entries · scroll →

Every dated event on this page, assembled chronologically. The page may cover events in a different order for the narrative; this is the straight timeline.

§2 · Kevin Roberts

The architect and his faith

Roberts’s Catholicism is not the story; the documented institutional ties are. We report them as ties and spiritual affiliation — not membership.

Kevin Roberts — Heritage president, Project 2025 architect, and his Opus Dei-linked institutions

FACT

Kevin Roberts is president of the Heritage Foundation and its lobbying arm Heritage Action, and the public architect of Project 2025. His ties to Opus Dei-led institutions are documented and, in one case, self-reported: Roberts acknowledged in a September 2023 speech that for years he has attended weekly mass at the Catholic Information Center, a Washington institution headed by an Opus Dei priest and incorporated by the archdiocese of Washington. He led the John Paul the Great Academy, whose patron is Josemaria Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei, and he was involved in an Opus Dei-affiliated high-school leadership program in Austin, Texas, per a site that tracks Opus Dei members' activities. We report these as close ties and spiritual affiliation; we do not assert Opus Dei membership, which is not publicly claimed. The Guardian, which reported the ties, characterizes Opus Dei as a 'radical Catholic group' — that description is the Guardian's, and we attribute it rather than adopt it.

'A distinction without separation, a union without confusion' — church and state, in their own words

FACT

On the website of an Opus Dei-affiliated institution, the relationship between church and state is described not as separation but as 'a distinction without separation, a union without confusion.' The formulation borrows the language the Church uses for the two natures of Christ and applies it to the state — a theological argument against the separation of church and state, stated plainly on the record. We quote it because it is their framing, not ours.

a distinction without separation, a union without confusion
§3 · Leonard Leo

The financier, in his own words

We do not need to call Leonard Leo an extremist. We can simply quote him.

Leonard Leo — 'barbarians, secularists and bigots' under 'the influence of the devil'

FACT

Leonard Leo is the co-chairman of the Federalist Society and a principal architect of the Supreme Court's conservative supermajority, at the center of a vast conservative dark-money network. In a 2022 speech accepting the Catholic Information Center's John Paul II New Evangelization award, Leo described his political opponents as 'vile and amoral current day barbarians, secularists and bigots' who were 'under the influence of the devil.' The words are his; the framing is explicitly one of spiritual warfare. Reporting on his public speeches has noted he casts the political struggle as, in effect, a war with the devil.

vile and amoral current day barbarians, secularists and bigots
§4 · The Agenda

What the plan would do — and who wrote its foreword

Project 2025 — 100+ groups, and a foreword by the Vice President

FACT

Project 2025 is a plan backed by more than 100 conservative groups that seeks to radically upend federal policy: limiting abortion access and LGBTQ+ rights, dismantling the Department of Education, ending diversity programs, and increasing government support for 'fertility awareness' methods rather than more reliable contraception. JD Vance — a Catholic convert — wrote the foreword to Roberts's book, originally titled 'Dawn's Early Light: Burning Down Washington to Save America,' retitled 'Taking Back Washington to Save America,' whose release Roberts postponed in August 2024 amid the Project 2025 controversy. On Trump: the plan was authored largely by former Trump officials and allies, but his campaign publicly disavowed it during the 2024 race — we note the ties and the denial together.

§5 · The Alliance

The thesis: a convergence, not a conspiracy

Traditionalist Catholics and evangelicals, converging on one project

SOME SMOKE

The larger argument this page makes is that a traditionalist-Catholic current — the Opus Dei-adjacent institutions around Roberts and Leo — has converged with the broader evangelical Christian right on a shared governing project, of which Project 2025 is the clearest expression. The theologian Massimo Faggioli describes Opus Dei as part of a movement of U.S. conservative and traditionalist Catholics who see this political moment, and the prospect of 'woke ideology' prevailing, as 'fundamentally changing the nature of America, western civilization and Christianity.' We grade this convergence SOME SMOKE, not FACT: it is a documented alignment of agenda and rhetoric, and it is our analytical read — not a proven, formally organized coalition. The evidence is the shared platform and the shared language, not a membership roster.

§6 · Why It Matters

A plan to run the state, and a reason to

The Corporate State hub documents a project to staff and run the government like a company, on a foundation of professed natural hierarchy. This page supplies the missing half of that story: the moral engine. When the men building the blueprint describe the separation of church and state as a doctrinal error, and cast their opponents as barbarians under the influence of the devil, the deregulatory, anti-DEI, anti-contraception planks stop reading as disconnected policy preferences and start reading as a single program with a theological spine. We have stopped short of calling that program theocratic in our own voice — but we have put its architects’ own words on the record, and invited the reader to weigh them.

§7 · Standing Invitation

If you are named on this page

If you are named on this page, or are a party materially affected by the claims made here, and you wish to respond, correct the record, or add context, use the Contact page. Responses are published verbatim alongside the original claim, with the sender identified and the date of receipt. The channel stays open for the life of the page.

This site aggregates and grades a record that other outlets and primary sources have already put on the record. Every FACT-graded claim above is sourced to court filings, government reports, sworn whistleblower disclosures, published investigative journalism, or named-source statements. The citations are the accountability mechanism; this section is how you get on the record too.

§8 · Sources

The record

▦ Ledger gaps

Help us fill these lines.

This entry is graded on what’s on the public record. These are the blanks we know about. If you can source one, you’re rebuilding the ledger with us.

  • OpenThe exact name of the Austin high-school leadership program and the specific Opus Dei-affiliated site that carries the 'distinction without separation' church-state language.Help fill this →
  • OpenThe documentable touchpoints (funding, shared institutions, joint campaigns) that would move the trad-Catholic/evangelical alliance from analytical thesis toward established coalition.Help fill this →
  • OpenThe full lobbying/funding record connecting Leo's network and Roberts's Heritage to the drafting of Project 2025's religious-agenda planks.Help fill this →

Notify me when a gap is filled

We'll email you when we fill one of the gaps above.

By signing up you agree to receive emails from The Black Book Audit. Unsubscribe anytime.